CAB148-30-Defence and Oversea Policy Committee Meetings Relating to 1967 Disturbances-1967 — Page 129

National Archives 英國國家檔案館 All

TOP SECRET

Page 129

during his visit to Australia the previous year, that we did not expect

to remain in Singapore beyond the middle 1970s. The most difficult

problem in the forthcoming consultations with our allies would be to

ensure that, as the Cabinet had decided, the possibility of withdrawing

altogether from the Far East without maintaining even a small maritime and air presence there was kept open for decision in June/July. Although

our allies might well be willing to see us reduce the size of our deployment in the Far East, they attached importance to our maintaining a

presence of some kind and particularly to our not saying publicly that we intended to withdraw completely. The best way of presenting our

proposals to them in order to retain our room for manoeuvre might be to

emphasise for presentational purposes our plans up to 1970-71, dealing

with the years beyond solely as a projection of these; some unattributable

briefing of the press on these lines might be undertaken in the hope of

preventing damaging publicity. The issues of policy involved in the Far

East were of crucial importance to the defence programme as a whole.

Firm guidance on the assumptions to be taken about our Far Eastern policy was

essential in time to carry out the detailed consequential work would be

required before announcements could be made in July about the future size

and shape of our forces.

THE COMMONWEALTH SECRETARY said that he was in agreement with the

report by officials, and particularly with the emphasis that it placed

on the importance of ensuring stability in Singapore, of granting

substantial aid and of ocnsultations with cur allies; so far as they were concerned the problem did not arise from the faster rundown that we now

had in mind in the short term, but from the fact that we were to withdraw wholly from Singapore/Malaysia by 1975-76. Although he had earlier

thought that it would be right, at the time of the consultations during the South East Asia Treaty Organisation (SEATO) Council meeting, for the

Prime Minister to send a message about our plans to the Australian Prime Minister (Mr. Holt), this should not be decided until later since

it would not be clear until the Foreign Secretary had initiated the consultations whether it would be necessary to send a message and if so

how far we should need to go in stating our intentions.

In discussion it was argued that our aim should be to withdraw wholly

from the Far East as soon as possible and that the forthcoming initial

consultations with our allies should be conducted in a manner which would

facilitate that aim. It was urged on this view that only if we were to declare our total withdrawal by a given date would it be possible for us

-2-

Page 129

TOP SECRET

Page 129

(97793)

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.